INTERACTION OF PEER HEALTH EDUCATION AND ARCS KELLER METHOD TO REDUCE THE RISK OF DM TYPE II
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol.23/no.2/art.1838Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of the interaction of peer health education and the Keller's ARCS method on reducing the risk of type II diabetes mellitus. The research method used a quasi-experimental design, with peer health education variables and the ARCS Keller method to reduce the risk of type II DM, sample size of 78 people, purposive sampling technique, data analysis using the Anova test. The results of the study showed that there was a reduction in the risk of type II DM before and after education through peer health education. There was an increase in motivation and a decrease in the risk of type II DM after being given education using the ARCS Keller method and there was no interaction between peer health education and the ARCS Keller method on reducing the risk of type II DM, that is, it is possible that there were other variables that contributed to reducing the risk of DM.
References
1. World Health organization. Diabetes country profiles: explanatory notes. 2016;(April):8.
2. Karuranga, Joao da Rocha Fernandes, Yadi Huang. Eighth edition 2017. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 8th edition. 2017. 1–150 p.
3. Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103(2):137–49.
4. Beckman J. Global E&P. Vol. 76, Offshore. 2016. 1 p.
5. Keller JM. ARCS Model of Motivation. Encycl Sci Learn. 2012;304–5.
6. Keller JM. Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. J Instr Dev. 1987;10(3):2–10.
7. Filippi ME. A role for municipal governments in leveraging transformative change for urban disaster risk management: the experience of Santa Fe, Argentina, with urban flood risk. Clim Risk Manag [Internet]. 2022;100397. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2022.100397
8. Singh TB, Mohanty R, Lalrhiatpuia L, Haobam M, Saini M. Aggression and Violent Behaviour: A Critical Review. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci. 2014;9(5):10–3.
9. Zaidi S, Das JK, Khan GN, Najmi R, Shah MM, Soofi SB. Food supplements to reduce stunting in Pakistan: A process evaluation of community dynamics shaping uptake. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–11.
10. Klassen A, Wickert N, Tsangaris E, Klaassen R, Anthony S. Health-Related Quality of Life. 2017;
11. Wu Y, Ding Y, Tanaka Y, Zhang W. Risk Factors Contributing to Type 2 Diabetes and Recent Advances in the Treatment and Prevention. 2014;11.
12. Simmons LA, Wolever RQ. Integrative Health Coaching and Motivational Interviewing: Synergistic Approaches to Behavior Change in Healthcare. Glob Adv Heal Med. 2013;2(4):28–35.
13. Saffari M, Pakpour AH, Naderi MK, Koenig HG, Baldacchino DR, Piper CN. Spiritual coping, religiosity and quality of life: A study on muslim patients undergoing haemodialysis. Nephrology. 2013;18(4):269–75.
14. Lambrinou E, Hansen TB, Beulens JWJ. Lifestyle factors , self-management and patient empowerment in diabetes care. 2019;
15. Appiah R. Community-based participatory research in rural African contexts: Ethico-cultural considerations and lessons from Ghana. Public Health Rev. 2020;41(1):1–13.
16. Despins LA. Factors influencing when intensive care unit nurses go to the bedside to investigate patient related alarms: A descriptive qualitative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs [Internet]. 2017;43:101–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2017.04.003
17. Tanimura C, Aoto H, Kobayashi N, Majbauddin A, Morita T, Otani S. Effects of a Self-efficacy Theory – Based Training Program for Peers of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. 2020;63(4):282–93.
18. Auster CJ. Blended Learning as a Potentially Winning Combination of Face-to-face and Online Learning: An Exploratory Study. Teach Sociol. 2016;44(1):39–48.
19. Proctor V. ln es s fe Health Coaching?: A partnership for your LIFE?! re e ea lth re Objectives.
20. Baghianimoghadam B. Current education versus peer-education on walking in type 2 diabetic patients based on Health Belief Model?: A randomized control trial study Current Education versus Peer-Education on Walking in Type 2 Diabetic Patients based on Health Belief Model?: A Randomized Control Trial Study. 2014;(April 2012).
21. Yudiernawati A. HEALTH PROMOTION MODEL?: PEER HEALTH EDUCATION TOWARD DECREASING RISK OF DIABETES MELLITUS TYPE II. 2019;7(1):1–3.
22. Kurt PY, Kecik I. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching THE EFFECTS OF CONCEPTUAL METAPHORS ON THE. Eur J Foreign Lang Teach. 2017;2(1):34–51.
2. Karuranga, Joao da Rocha Fernandes, Yadi Huang. Eighth edition 2017. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 8th edition. 2017. 1–150 p.
3. Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103(2):137–49.
4. Beckman J. Global E&P. Vol. 76, Offshore. 2016. 1 p.
5. Keller JM. ARCS Model of Motivation. Encycl Sci Learn. 2012;304–5.
6. Keller JM. Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. J Instr Dev. 1987;10(3):2–10.
7. Filippi ME. A role for municipal governments in leveraging transformative change for urban disaster risk management: the experience of Santa Fe, Argentina, with urban flood risk. Clim Risk Manag [Internet]. 2022;100397. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2022.100397
8. Singh TB, Mohanty R, Lalrhiatpuia L, Haobam M, Saini M. Aggression and Violent Behaviour: A Critical Review. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci. 2014;9(5):10–3.
9. Zaidi S, Das JK, Khan GN, Najmi R, Shah MM, Soofi SB. Food supplements to reduce stunting in Pakistan: A process evaluation of community dynamics shaping uptake. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–11.
10. Klassen A, Wickert N, Tsangaris E, Klaassen R, Anthony S. Health-Related Quality of Life. 2017;
11. Wu Y, Ding Y, Tanaka Y, Zhang W. Risk Factors Contributing to Type 2 Diabetes and Recent Advances in the Treatment and Prevention. 2014;11.
12. Simmons LA, Wolever RQ. Integrative Health Coaching and Motivational Interviewing: Synergistic Approaches to Behavior Change in Healthcare. Glob Adv Heal Med. 2013;2(4):28–35.
13. Saffari M, Pakpour AH, Naderi MK, Koenig HG, Baldacchino DR, Piper CN. Spiritual coping, religiosity and quality of life: A study on muslim patients undergoing haemodialysis. Nephrology. 2013;18(4):269–75.
14. Lambrinou E, Hansen TB, Beulens JWJ. Lifestyle factors , self-management and patient empowerment in diabetes care. 2019;
15. Appiah R. Community-based participatory research in rural African contexts: Ethico-cultural considerations and lessons from Ghana. Public Health Rev. 2020;41(1):1–13.
16. Despins LA. Factors influencing when intensive care unit nurses go to the bedside to investigate patient related alarms: A descriptive qualitative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs [Internet]. 2017;43:101–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2017.04.003
17. Tanimura C, Aoto H, Kobayashi N, Majbauddin A, Morita T, Otani S. Effects of a Self-efficacy Theory – Based Training Program for Peers of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. 2020;63(4):282–93.
18. Auster CJ. Blended Learning as a Potentially Winning Combination of Face-to-face and Online Learning: An Exploratory Study. Teach Sociol. 2016;44(1):39–48.
19. Proctor V. ln es s fe Health Coaching?: A partnership for your LIFE?! re e ea lth re Objectives.
20. Baghianimoghadam B. Current education versus peer-education on walking in type 2 diabetic patients based on Health Belief Model?: A randomized control trial study Current Education versus Peer-Education on Walking in Type 2 Diabetic Patients based on Health Belief Model?: A Randomized Control Trial Study. 2014;(April 2012).
21. Yudiernawati A. HEALTH PROMOTION MODEL?: PEER HEALTH EDUCATION TOWARD DECREASING RISK OF DIABETES MELLITUS TYPE II. 2019;7(1):1–3.
22. Kurt PY, Kecik I. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching THE EFFECTS OF CONCEPTUAL METAPHORS ON THE. Eur J Foreign Lang Teach. 2017;2(1):34–51.
Downloads
Published
2023-08-28
How to Cite
Yudiernawati, A., Maria Diah Ciptaningtyas, Dyah Widodo, & Swito Prastiwi. (2023). INTERACTION OF PEER HEALTH EDUCATION AND ARCS KELLER METHOD TO REDUCE THE RISK OF DM TYPE II. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 23(2), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol.23/no.2/art.1838
Issue
Section
Articles
